The Media Of Baseball And The Case Against Roger Clemens...

As I mentioned previously in the paper, the media plays a huge role in the development of people perceptions and attitudes towards certain things that occur in the modern history. The link between the growing popularity of the baseball as well as increased attention to the steroids used represent topics that were highly affected by the media. The article by Healey Fall Of The Rocket: Steroids In Baseball And The Case Against Roger Clemens (2008) reveals how the drug policy has developed over time. This source explains and examines Major League Baseball’s drug policy through the years of its evolution. It uses great examples of what used to be allowed to consume and what has been banned through the growing rules in baseball. The author also breaks down how the â€Å"Steroid Era† affected baseball from numbers of standpoints and points out the greatly risen home-run numbers that include the great home-run chase between some of the game’s greatest sluggers of all time. Therefore, previously mentioned research about the home-run probability was affect by the growing trend of examining professional players’ performance. The performance that goes beyond the possible one by an average player received a critical attention by the Major League Baseball. The article, â€Å"Under Mounting Pressure: A History Of Media Influence On Major League Baseball Steroid Policies,† is based on the relationship between Major League Baseball and the media. The authors break down how the media reports onShow MoreRelatedAnabolic Steroids : A Fatal Attraction1734 Words   |  7 PagesAmerican baseball players, and even racehorses have tested positive for AAS. However, AAS are no longer the exclusive province of elite athletes. Among school seniors in the United States (18 years of age), the lifetime incidence for steroid use (4.0%) is comparable to that for crack cocaine (3.6%) or heroin (1.8%). Today, it is estimated that over 3million people may have used AAS† (Wood 227). Athletes have used Anabolic Steroids for years in bodybuilding as well as recently in baseball. AnabolicRead MoreBeing an athlete is not an easy task especially when you’re constantly competing, throughout more1800 Words   |  8 Pagesthat status. However, the average athlete feels that they are not good enough to compete at the next level. This often causes them to resort to them using steroids so they can be better than good enough. Steroids are used in many sports such as baseball, football, cycling, and track. This illegal drug has even made its way down to young adults in high school who are trying to obtain a professional sports career. As a teenager playing a sport is very competitive. Also, most young adults face extremeRead MoreHow are the Majority of Celebrities Inappropriate Role Models for the Youth?1262 Words   |  5 Pagescelebrities abuse the power of their fame. Ellen DeGeneres, a talk show host, has come out as openly gay and is a supporter of gay rights and equality. She uses her fame and her supporters to spread her beliefs on the subject of gay rights. Being gay is against Biblical teachings and principles. Stars like Oprah Winfrey, use their influence on others to persuade them to vote for a certain person in an important election. Other stars use their fame to promote a religious belief. There are few celebritiesRead MoreDrugs Are Bad Or Bad?2007 Words   |  9 Pageshave become very bia sed, and lose trust in the professionals who perform these sports. The amount of cases has increased since the seventies. This is because pro athletes have gotten away with it, and through the media it has become acceptable for young adults to use these performance enhancement drugs. All it takes is one person getting away with it for others to join them. Also, most cases start with harsh and long recovery injuries that need a bunch of therapy. Athletes are told that if theyRead MoreEssay about Americas Obsession With Sports2251 Words   |  10 Pagesthe giant business of mass broadcasting. Sports media has had it advantages and its disadvantages, and its truths and falsehoods in the world of sports culture. A negative vibe is felt when the media shapes its viewers’ perception of athletes by depicting them negatively or unappreciated based on race or gender stereotypes. One such group that the media tends to misrepresent is female athletes. Women athletes tend to get less coverage in the media than men do. Many times a commentary given a boutRead MoreMID TERM STUDY GUIDE Essay16611 Words   |  67 Pagesadulthood was: (4) a. The combustible engine b. The telephone c. The printing press *** d. The computer 2. In the 17th century two people who thought that children should be treated with thought and care were: (5) a. Locke and Rousseau *** b. Rogers and Maslow c. Dixon and Binet d. Freud and Freud 3. Adults may underestimate children’s ability to: (7) a. Learn b. Problem-solve c. Recognize reality d. All of the above *** 4. Family conditions that promote resilience include: (11) a. fewRead MoreEarly Supplier Integration in the Design of the Skid-Steer Loader18409 Words   |  74 Pageswho are expert in certain domains and knit them together to allow us to create solutions to satisfy our customers’ needs and support our business vision. Q: Does this mean that suppliers will be working with other suppliers? Noshirwani: In some cases, absolutely. Then the question is: How do we broker them to partner with each other to bring us the best result? Q: With this new business focus, what sort of measures do you use to determine your success? Noshirwani: Previously, the majority of

Heritage and Production of Archaeological Data Free Essays

our site – CUSTOM ESSAY WRITING – EXAMPLE ESSAY Introduction This critical analysis essay centers on heritage, discussing what it demonstrates about the production of archaeological data through case studies. It covers a discussion of whether the production of archaeological data is always objective. There is an assumed synergy between heritage and archaeological data, as demonstrated by the concept â€Å"Archaeological Heritage Management† (Waterton and Smith, 2009: 41). We will write a custom essay sample on Heritage and Production of Archaeological Data or any similar topic only for you Order Now Taking the archaeological point of view, heritage is often referred to as the material culture of the past, or those manmade structures and artefacts that comprise the archaeological record and are intended to explain the past (Waterton and Smith, 2009). The production of archeological data is a result of a study and observation of archeological record, which helps establish the domain of heritage (Binfold, 2009). Is the production of archaeological data always objective? The production of archaeological data is always objective, and this is recognised explicitly by the literature (e.g. Waterton and Smith, 2009). The ways in which heritage demonstrates this objectivity is seen in the tacit assumption embodied in the knowledge being produced from interpreting the past, which informs identity and is thus called ‘heritage’ (Waterton and Smith, 2009: 42), as well as the needed consistency of the data (both in terms of individual inventory and organisational inventory) so that they may be capable of use in the future (Barrett, et al., 2007). Since data must be consistent to this level, subjectivity has therefore no room in their production. Worthy of note is the fact that there are various contexts from which the production of heritage can take place, ranging from historical documents, archaeological excavations, values and meanings placed on heritage such as buildings and natural environment. Similarly, archeological heritage is commonly produced through research as well as academic discourses, which in fact help promote what is considered ‘heritage’ (Hicks, McAtackney, and Fairclough, 2007: 102). In managing the artistic heritage, the acquisition of data is an important aspect (Ferrari, 2010). Since archaeological heritage is produced through research and is formed by inferences through discourses, it is but proper to say that such process of production is objectively carried out since research itself is a field of objective characterisation. The notion that heritage is characterised by ‘multi-vocality’ (Habu, Fawcett, and Matsunaga, 2008: 38; Waterton and Smith, 2009: 42) does not automatically suggest that it is non-definitive and subjective in its production of archeological data. Archaeological data are material, and this materiality enables the concept of heritage to become intrinsically knowable and controllable. These knowable and controllable characteristics is seen in the extent through which archaeological heritage can be defined, discovered, recorded, managed, and conserved. The naturalisation of archaeological assumptions also supports this knowable nature of heritage in legal and policy documents (Waterton and Smith, 2009). Such process cannot therefore be merely placed in some subjective assumptions of data production. This is further supported by an assertion (e.g. Hodder, 2004) that archaeology can take an interpretive form, and its role is to facilitate the involvement of the past in the pr esent period through objective archaeological data. Smith (2004) also calls objects from the past as part of an objective archaeological record, reinforcing the general claim of the literature on the subject. Additionally, much can be learned about past history by using more theorised approaches to understand the relationship between history and archaeology (Robertson, Seibert, Fernandez, 2006). Such theory application is an objective stance of the archeological field (e.g. Cobb, Harris, Jones et al., 2012; Gibbon, 2014; Jones, 2002). Case studies on heritage and production of archaeological data A case study that may be cited in this paper is the Lodenice project in central Bohemia in the early 1990s, which is also known for a Viereckschanze (rectangular enclosure) excavation. This project identified an Iron Age settlement and remnants of decorative arm rings dating from 2nd to first centuries BC. This project, which produced a Celtic carved rag stone head, used an analytical fieldwork survey and multivariate mathematical analysis, combined with geographical information system (GIS) (Hicks et al., 2007). This example demonstrates the extent to which the production of archaeological data aims to be as objective as possible, for the archaeologies may simply assume the nature of data collected, but lack of definite measurements and other objective applications would place the whole investigation into mere assumptions. Another case that may be cited is the Bylany Project in Norway (1990s). Grants were used to finance archaeological research, enabling the excavation of Neolithic circular enclosures of Bylany’s complex. The integration of National Heritage Institute with rescue excavation administration has been a pending situation, which can negatively impact long-term archeological research in the Kutna Hora region. This archeological research is currently on systematic monitoring (Biehl and Prescott, 2013). The production of archaeological data informs of their use for future research and knowledge production as well as their objective and systematic production, reinforcing the idea that these data are always objective. Moreover in England, a data standard for the Sites and Monuments Records (SMRs) was established in the 1990s, facilitated by what is now known as the English Heritage’s National Monument Record. This data standard acknowledged the importance of records, including the activities of people involved in studying the resource, the sources of such information, and information on the process of managing the resource. This is to enable the successful management of the archaeological and historic environment within which archaeological data are derived (Barrett, Dingwall, Gaffney, et al., 2007). This manner of record-keeping for the production of archaeological data reveals the importance of objectivity. Worthy of discussion is the Tsodillo rock art in Botswana, which was the focus of intensive survey programme and recording by the Botswana National Museum during the late 20th century. The rock art holds the archaeological evidence that human settlement once existed in the landscape (Hicks et al., 2007). The recording and survey carried out by the Museum indicate the pursuit for objectivity in the investigation of the Tsodillo landscape. These case studies discuss what heritage demonstrates about the production of archaeological data being systematically acquired and processed, and thus entail the collaboration of specific government organisations in charge of heritage and archaeological data management. Thus, despite the perceived artistry of heritage, it is largely governed by some objectivity and system-specific characteristics in the production of archaeological data. Conclusion This critical analysis essay has discussed what heritage demonstrates about the production of archaeological data. It has focused on whether the production of archaeological data is always objective, illustrating the answer through cases studies. This brief claims that such production is indeed always objective, as reinforced by the extant literature denoting such objectivity and systematic stances. These data must necessarily be consistent in order for them to be of viable use in the future; hence, subjectivity has no room in their production. Moreover, archaeological data are material, enabling them to become inherently knowable and controllable and are thus definable, discoverable, recordable, manageable, and conservable. Case studies are provided, aiming to serve as evidence for the objectivity of the production of archaeological data. References Barrett, G., Dingwall, L., Gaffney, V., Fitch, S., Huckerby, C., and Maguire, T. (2007) Heritage Management at Ford Hood, Texas: Experiments in Historic Landscape Characterisation. England: Archaeopress. Biehl, P. F. and Prescott, C. (2013) Heritage in the Context of Globalization: Europe and the Americas. NY: Springer. Binfold, L. R. (2009) Debating Archaeology: Updated Edition. CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Cobb, H., Harris, O. J. T., Jones, C., and Richardson, P. (2012) Reconsidering Archaeological Fieldwork: Exploring On-Site Relationships Between Theory and Practice. NY: Springer. Ferrari, A. (2010) The 8th Framework Programme of the European Commission and the Safeguard of Cultural Heritage: The EACH Project. Italy: CNR, Institute of Chemical Methodologies. Gibbon, G. (2014) Critically Reading the Theory and Methods of Archaeology: An Introductory Guide. Maryland: AltaMira Press. Habu, J., Fawcett, C., and Matsunaga, J. M. (2008) Evaluating Multiple Narratives: Beyond Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist Archaeologies. NY: Springer. Hicks, D., McAtackney, L., and Fairclough, J. (2007) Envisioning Landscape: Situations and Standpoints in Archaeology and Heritage. CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Hodder, I. (2004) Theory and Practice in Archaeology. NY: Routledge. Jones, A. (2002) Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. UK: Cambridge University Press. Robertson, E. C., Seibert, J. D., Fernandez, D. C., and Zender, M. U. (2006) Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Alberta: University of Calgary Press. Smith, L. (2004) Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge. Waterton, E. and Smith, L. (2009) Heritage, Communities and Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury Academic. How to cite Heritage and Production of Archaeological Data, Essay examples

Exercises Problems Solutions free essay sample

Her owner’s equity decreased by $14,000 for the operating expenses recorded on August 10th, by $400 for the interest expense recorded on August 24th, and by $10,000 for the cash dividend recorded on August 29th. In other words, her owner’s equity was increased by revenues, and it was decreased by expenses and dividends. Interest is an expense because it represents a necessary payment to others (i. e. , creditors) for the use of their money—thus, it is a â€Å"cost† of doing business. Dividends are a distribution of profits to the owners of the firm and represent a partial liquidation of the firm. A dividend is not an expense because it represents a profit distribution; it is not a â€Å"cost† of doing business. f. g. When money is borrowed from the bank, an asset (cash) is increased and a liability (notes payable) is also increased by an equal amount. Net income is increased only when revenue has been earned—and money borrowed from the bank represents a liability that must be repaid, not revenue that has been earned. We will write a custom essay sample on Exercises Problems Solutions or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Paying off accounts payable decreases an asset (cash) and decreases a liability (accounts payable) by an equal amount. Collecting an account receivable increases an asset (cash) and decreases another asset (accounts receivable) by equal amounts. In both cases, only balance sheet accounts are involved. Net income is increased by revenues and decreased by expenses. The expense associated with a cash payment of an account payable would have been recorded in an earlier transaction (when the expense was incurred and the account payable was established); by the same logic, the revenue associated with the collection of an account receivable would have been recorded in an earlier transaction (when the revenue was earned and the account receivable was established).Amounts shown in the balance sheet below reflect the following use of the data given: An asset should have a probable future economic benefit; therefore the accounts receivable are stated at the amount expected to be collected from customers. Assets are reported at original cost, not current worth. Depreciation in accounting reflects the spreading of the cost of an asset over its estimated useful life. Assets are reported at original cost, not at an assessed or appraised value. The amount of the note payable is calculated using the accounting equation, A = L + OE. Total assets can be determined based on items (a), (b), and (c); total owners equity is known after considering item (e); and the note payable is the difference between total liabilities and the accounts payable. The retained earnings account balance represents the difference between cumulative net income and cumulative dividends. The problem could be solved without calculating this number.